This is my choice also.averageguy wrote:I love pointing dogs, so that is what I hunt behind. I think it is a commonly heard misnomer that as we age we need slow close working dogs. I disagree with that completely if the intent is hunt wild birds. I think we need broke dogs which find, point and hold birds until we arrive, but otherwise the dog hunts out so we do not have to walk over every possible place where there might be birds, as would be the case with a boot polishing dog. When I cannot walk to a dog on point then I guess I will quit upland bird hunting, but until then I remained thrilled to do so.
I also find pointing dogs more relaxing to hunt with vs a flushing dog, which I think favors aging hunters. FWIW I hunt behind a GWP but that has a lot to do with using the dog for Upland, Waterfowl and Blood Tracking. If all I hunted was upland birds I would likely have an EP or GSP and let them roll until they found and pointed birds. Where birds are thick that will not be too far away, where they are sparse it will be farther but either way I get to see my dog point birds and probably get to shoot some as well. And if birds are sparse then wearing myself out walking behind a boot polisher does not accomplish anything as the alternative.
Best of Luck with your next dog.
He's in Alberta. He posted that. I would think a pointing dog would be easier to follow than a flusher. Spaniels move pretty quick. A lab might be ok.Max2 wrote:Geeze folks I wish you people would put a state for your location. When someone posts I often wonder where they are located. Perhaps if uncomfortable about posting town at least a state could possibly be included.
I'm a notch off 60 and Location is Scotland.Zebo wrote:Looking for recommendations, I hunt rough grouse and released pheasants in Alberta Canada. I have had labs, Springers and a disastrous time with a gsp. I was looking at cockers,puddlepointers or pointing labs.
That's interesting. 71 now and my setter is almost 13 so I've been thinking about the next dog too. I was going to get a spaniel but may have to rethink that.gonehuntin' wrote:Zebo, I'm nearly 73 and I want you to consider this. If you have a flusher, YOU have to cover all of the ground a flusher does. If you have a pointing dog that runs to objectives, HE covers the ground for you and you walk up and shoot the birds. Let me give you an example. We were hunting some rolling prairie a couple years ago and ahead of us about 1/4 mile was a damp pothole, loaded with cattail. The Draht spotted it and took off in a straight line for it, then hunted it. There were no birds there. My friend, Gary, and I were standing on a hill and he said "That really is an old man's dog isn't she?"
I prefer the dog cover the ground and find the birds while I observe then shoot. The older I get, the more I observe.
I have to say that this thread has given me some new heroes. CJ Hills and Art Hubbard are apparently hunting hard at 80+. Clearly pointing dogs are good for you.cjhills wrote:This is my choice also.averageguy wrote:I love pointing dogs, so that is what I hunt behind. I think it is a commonly heard misnomer that as we age we need slow close working dogs. I disagree with that completely if the intent is hunt wild birds. I think we need broke dogs which find, point and hold birds until we arrive, but otherwise the dog hunts out so we do not have to walk over every possible place where there might be birds, as would be the case with a boot polishing dog. When I cannot walk to a dog on point then I guess I will quit upland bird hunting, but until then I remained thrilled to do so.
I also find pointing dogs more relaxing to hunt with vs a flushing dog, which I think favors aging hunters. FWIW I hunt behind a GWP but that has a lot to do with using the dog for Upland, Waterfowl and Blood Tracking. If all I hunted was upland birds I would likely have an EP or GSP and let them roll until they found and pointed birds. Where birds are thick that will not be too far away, where they are sparse it will be farther but either way I get to see my dog point birds and probably get to shoot some as well. And if birds are sparse then wearing myself out walking behind a boot polisher does not accomplish anything as the alternative.
Best of Luck with your next dog.
20 years ago at 60, I phased out all of my Springers and went totally to pointing dogs because I did not have to keep up. I can walk the trails while they find the birds. Sometimes they have to hold point for a long time....................Cj
It is good for we young fellows who, after all, represent the future of birdhunting to interact with you older gentlemen. I am a dynamic 70.ezzy333 wrote:I didn't realize that either rof you gentlemen were my age. Just turned 85 last month.
Ezzy
I'm 72 and this post is exactly along with my thinking. Since I can't cover the ground like I use I want a dog that will cover more ground for me. Not a boot licker. I have a big running Brittany. If you have a pointing dog as you are get older, I fail to understand why you would want a closer working dog except maybe for the grouse woods.gonehuntin' wrote:Zebo, I'm nearly 73 and I want you to consider this. If you have a flusher, YOU have to cover all of the ground a flusher does. If you have a pointing dog that runs to objectives, HE covers the ground for you and you walk up and shoot the birds. Let me give you an example. We were hunting some rolling prairie a couple years ago and ahead of us about 1/4 mile was a damp pothole, loaded with cattail. The Draht spotted it and took off in a straight line for it, then hunted it. There were no birds there. My friend, Gary, and I were standing on a hill and he said "That really is an old man's dog isn't she?"
I prefer the dog cover the ground and find the birds while I observe then shoot. The older I get, the more I observe.
Zebo is Long gone in February ! Just leaving the rest to pontificate.CDN_Cocker wrote:He's in Alberta. He posted that. I would think a pointing dog would be easier to follow than a flusher. Spaniels move pretty quick. A lab might be ok.Max2 wrote:Geeze folks I wish you people would put a state for your location. When someone posts I often wonder where they are located. Perhaps if uncomfortable about posting town at least a state could possibly be included.
In general I have to agree with the above...... and Robert (Polmaise) and I have been known to disagree !polmaise wrote:I never actually knew most of You guys are average age over retirement ! (Other than Bill (Trekmoor) , but he was old when he was born . lol )
Respect !!
Now that in it'self determines the posters replies, never mind the state. With all due respect , there is absolutely No person on earth at the age of you guys hunting any breed in cover or terrain in the grounds that certain breeds are capable of or best suited for ,for that game quarry at that time of year in that state /country if it requires a level of fitness that most 25 year old's have a heart attack .
The best breed for the OP is 'anything' . Just train it to work in the environment you are in for the requirements you can work with ,to fit your ability .
Wow!!!!! Maybe I misjudged you. Mine make me walk four miles every day. Some I would rather take a nap........................CjSharon wrote:Exactly Bill!
No matter how old you are, if you can still walk - even with a cane- get some kind of dog. They make you get up and go at least a couple times a week and a pup more than once a day. Otherwise I'd be sitting on the couch yelling at Trump. ...... and I'm Canadian.
OP( Zebo ) Early 60s and healthy ? Get what you want and enjoy.
(Welcome to the forum.)
Those British dogs are built more for waterfowl hunting. They are typically bulkier with shorter legs. Great disposition but I don't think the American Lab could be improved on much in that department. Just looking at one of those makes me wonder how well they would hold up in the pheasant fields. They don't seem to be designed for a lot of agility. I would prefer something more traditional in build. My younger Lab has long legs and slender build for her breed with the usual big retriever paws. She can swim like a speedboat and keep going all day when we're after uplands in Montana. Just what the doctor ordered for my kind of hunting. Now if Mother Nature will just cut us a break so she'll have some birds to chase this year. Most of my waterfowl hunting here is in the fields not over water or surf so bulkiness in my retrievers is not that important for me even when we're after geese and ducks. Big heavy dogs are more inclined to have skeletal problems like early arthritis and hip issues. And they eat a lot. But they are good looking dogs for sure. I say pick what will work best for you, not necessarily what's most appealing to the eye.
Add on:: Nov 2018, she went on point 258 yards out. I would have never walked out to that area. She held point on a covey of about 50 quail. Once broke up she worked singles at 30 yard range.oldbeek wrote: ↑Sun May 06, 2018 12:51 am I have a Brittany she runs big. No Huge,, in open terrain. But she is very intelligent. When hunting and she smells a covey of birds ahead she stops and looks back to me with a stance, almost a point that I know she has birds ahead. Chucker hunting in steep terrain, she knows to wait for me about every 20 yards. I use a tracking collar and she does not budge on point. Will work about 100 yards out in heavy brush. I am 76.